Mongolian American “brothers” Ankhaa (Erdenemunkh Tumursukh) and Orgil (Iveel Mashbat) are furniture movers living in Los Angeles. When Ankhaa’s blood brother needs an operation that the family can’t possibly afford, Ankhaa and Orgil devise a plan to kidnap a wealthy man’s son who they’d previously done a job for. The two men are a bit at odds about how to carry out the plan – one wants to go over every detail repeatedly, the other more confidently wants to get to action. The first sign that maybe they really should’ve talked over this plan more is when a man approaches their car where they’re idling in the dark. Orgil asks who the man is and Ankhaa answers, “Don’t worry, you don’t know him,” before the man (Saint Ranson) gets into the back seat of their car and presents the pistol for them to buy. Orgil freaks out, because he didn’t think guns were part of the plan, and starts shouting in Mongolian while Ankhaa tries to calm down both him and the now increasingly agitated gun seller. It’s a funny, tense scene, and the first example of what the film will return to throughout: masculine men put in difficult spots unwilling to compromise.
Filmed in attractive black and white photography on a micro budget, In the Land of Lost Angels is a kidnapping thriller with a cast of maybe six people, set almost entirely in cars, cramped apartments, and nondescript hotel rooms. It takes place over a week, with days presented like chapters. It’s an interesting thriller in that the stakes aren’t continually raised, but rather the relationship between the kidnappers becomes so strained that it throws the job and their lives into jeopardy.
There are very few glimpses of the world beyond our main characters, but we occasionally hear TV or radio clips from the news, including snippets about the former president as well as a speaker that, for me, called to mind Jordan Peterson. In the Land of Lost Angels is a movie about immigrants resorting to desperate means to save a loved one in an uncaring country, yes, but it’s also a film about toxic masculinity. When things go bad, Ankhaa and Orgil begin to turn on each other about how to handle the job, in particular whether to let their hostage live or not. Their posturing and need to be seen as tougher than the other is a big part of their undoing in the criminal plot.
The film is at its best when its not raging but rather when it is quiet. The film’s soundtrack is largely made up by the heightened sound of white noise in a silent space, lending a lonely isolation to the characters and the audience. The camera, with some exceptions, largely does not move in the long, often one-take scenes, and is frequently positioned at odd angles that do not show our leads in close-up. The style of the film creates mild unease.
In the Land of Lost Angels is the feature directorial debut of writer/director Bishrel Mashbat and if there’s anything I’m going to take from the movie it’s that I believe its creator is worth paying attention to. This movie doesn’t do anything particularly new for kidnapping thrillers but it does its thing admirably well on a small budget and there’s enough flourish to the filming techniques, as well as the writing, to suggest a growing talent.
I also like that, though the movie is known for being one of the first Mongolian American films, it isn’t trying to tell the story of all Mongolian Americans. It’s very self-contained, its aspirations simple and all the better for it: it is a tense Asian American crime story that’s done in an hour and a half, that ends with one of the best shots in the film.
I’m happy the movie exists and would like there to be more like it, either by Mashbat or other filmmakers like him.